KASS | IP Experts

Intellectual Property

  • What
    • Patent
    • Trademark
    • Industrial Design
    • Copyright
    • IP Management
    • IPR Enforcement
    • Franchising
      • Franchising in Malaysia
      • Franchising in Singapore
      • Franchising in Indonesia
      • Franchising in Thailand
      • Franchising in Vietnam
      • Franchising in Myanmar
    • IP Awareness
      • Workshops
      • Publications
    • Other Services
      • Confidential Information
      • Image Rights
      • Product Development
      • Privacy Rights
      • Litigation Support
  • Why
    • Testimonials
    • Case Studies
      • Patent
      • Trademark
      • Industrial Design
      • Copyright
  • Who
    • Team
      • P. Kandiah
      • Geetha Kandiah
      • Carola Monintja
      • Hapsari Dwi Astuti
      • Ronald Ephrahim Mongula
      • Gita Fardani Swastina
      • Thein Thein Win
      • Saowanee Leewijitsin
      • Megha Anand
      • Ilangkumanan Kashaban
      • Jagannathan Arumugam
      • Sharrmila Palanyandy
      • Haziq Adam
      • Hemanisha Baskaran
      • Tharishini Manalan
      • Hardeep Singh
      • Amir Murshidi
      • Hoh Jerick
      • Alisa Rajamalar Muniandy
      • Nurwalfa Izin
      • Sajjaratul Yaqeen
    • Offices
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Indonesia
      • Myanmar
      • Thailand
      • Vietnam
  • Blog
    • News
    • Media
    • Events
    • Articles
    • I Thought
  • Contact
    • Enquiry
    • E-newsletter
    • Career

Patent

patent malaysia case studies

Problem?

A Malaysian patent licensee sued our client, another Malaysian company, for patent infringement of an environmental quality control system.

Solution!

We counter-claimed for revocation of the patent, and for a declaration that the licence holder had no basis for the patent, and therefore no basis for their action against our client.

Result:

The court ruled in our client’s favour!

Lesson…

The case illustrated two important lessons. First, although the patent licensee believed that their rights were protected through the patent and the license, this case illustrated that their license did not carry the protection or value they originally perceived.

Secondly, our client had the presence of mind to seek professional advice in the matter and in doing so ultimately protected his right to continue doing business.

 

© 2018 KASS International | Privacy Policy.
KASS Website
  • What
    ▼
    • Patent
    • Trademark
    • Industrial Design
    • Copyright
    • IP Management
    • IPR Enforcement
    • Franchising
      ▼
      • Franchising in Malaysia
      • Franchising in Singapore
      • Franchising in Indonesia
      • Franchising in Thailand
      • Franchising in Vietnam
      • Franchising in Myanmar
    • IP Awareness
      ▼
      • Workshops
      • Publications
    • Other Services
      ▼
      • Confidential Information
      • Image Rights
      • Product Development
      • Privacy Rights
      • Litigation Support
  • Why
    ▲
    • Testimonials
    • Case Studies
      ▲
      • Patent
      • Trademark
      • Industrial Design
      • Copyright
  • Who
    ▼
    • Team
      ▼
      • P. Kandiah
      • Geetha Kandiah
      • Carola Monintja
      • Hapsari Dwi Astuti
      • Ronald Ephrahim Mongula
      • Gita Fardani Swastina
      • Thein Thein Win
      • Saowanee Leewijitsin
      • Megha Anand
      • Jagannathan Arumugam
      • Ilangkumanan Kashaban
      • Sharrmila Palanyandy
      • Haziq Adam
      • Hemanisha Baskaran
      • Tharishini Manalan
      • Hardeep Singh
      • Amir Murshidi
      • Alisa Rajamalar Muniandy
      • Hoh Jerick
      • Nurwalfa Izin
    • Offices
      ▼
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Indonesia
      • Myanmar
      • Vietnam
      • Thailand
  • Blog
    ▼
    • News
    • Media
    • Events
    • Articles
    • I Thought
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Enquiry
    • E-newsletter
    • Career